Reviews that start with the evidence.

Each person gets a proposed assessment from their goals, attendance and productivity. Managers confirm it, change it, or record why they see it differently.

Team performance for August: 47.9 per cent average productivity across fourteen people, 1001 hours 30 minutes tracked and 84.3 per cent attendance, over a review queue

A queue, not a blank document

Everyone sits in one of four states: to review, confirmed, changed, or rejected. A review empties rather than being written from nothing.

The queue
To reviewThe proposal is already on the row
Confirmed, changed, rejectedThree ways to close it, with the reason kept
Nothing written from scratchThe evidence is attached before you open it

Four levels. One measure.

Organization, department, team and person — over any window from today to a range you set.

Scope
Four levelsOrganization, department, team, person
Any windowToday, this week, last month, or a custom range
Same measure throughoutA team number is its people, not a separate metric

Tell people where they stand, and why.

Run review cycles once or twice a year. Each person can read where their manager placed them and the reasons behind it.

Review cycles
Your rhythmOnce or twice a year
Their side of itWhere their manager placed them, and why
Told when it’s readyA notification when the review is shared

Take the whole picture with you

Export the table to CSV or Excel from whatever filter you are viewing.

Export
CSV or ExcelBoth, from the same button
What you filteredThe export matches the view, not the whole table

Give every review a starting point.

14-day trial. From 10 active users.